Skip to Content

westwood station condos

Project Background/Update: Condominiums Still the Game Plan

by jaydoherty

I wanted to provide some background on one of the recent developments in the Westwood Station project. Before doing so, it's important to note that the economic climate surrounding the project has changed dramatically in the last few months. For us at CC&F, the debate between economists as to whether or not we have entered a recession, is an academic discussion. The financing markets have turned downward dramatically and lending conditions are very challenging. We are very fortunate in that our joint venture partner, Commonfund, is very strong financially and able to provide the project with substantial equity investment. We are also fortunate that our retail partner, Steve Karp of New England Development, have recruited many strong, high quality national retailers to the project. Nothwithstanding those strengths, the project still requires a considerable amount of construction financing and construction lenders have uniformly become more conservative, tightening both lending conditions and financing terms. The harsh markets have already caused the indefinite delay of several major projects in the region including North Point (Cambridge), Southfield (the redevelopment of Weymouth Naval Station), Columbus Center (Boston), and much of Fan Pier (only the office portion is proceeding).

Westwood Station's commitment to condominium development and sales of the residences remains unchanged. Otis & Ahearn is the broker/marketing agent and plans are underway for construction of an on-site marketing and sales office. All units are still to be designed and constructed to facilitate sale as condominiums. Condominium sales generate greater profits for the development than rentals (and so, of course, we strongly prefer to sell all units) but, given current market conditions, lenders will not provide financing on units that are exclusively restricted to condominium sale. The prior terms of the draft Development Agreement provided constraints on rental terms that lenders now will simply not accept in their financing. For example, one prior condition provided that no resident could renew any lease after two years (thereby forcing eviction of that individual). The intent was to provide us, the developer, with a further incentive to convert rentals to condos as rapidly as possible by making it more challenging to keep the units rented.

We are optimistic that Westwood Station will carve out a unique position in the greater Boston residential development market. It's worth noting, however, that virtually all major project financing now involves several national or international lenders, few of whom are based in Boston. A decade or so ago, a strong Boston project might be able to make a special appeal to Bank of Boston, or Bank of New England. Now, the major lending institutions are spread out around the globe and have little special affinity for a particular region. Our optimisim is appreciated, but not bankable, thus the change in rental conditions. Again, this does not change our business objectives. Condo sales remain easily the most preferrable way financially to bring residences to market. It's my belief that the unique mixed-use character and Westwood location of the project will very much do its part to help make this happen. What is less certain is what will happen to the national and regional economy and what impact that will have on condominium sales.

I hope this background is helpful and I am prepared to provide similar information on other aspects of the project or to answer specific questions if that is useful.

Jay Doherty
Cabot, Cabot & Forbes

Letter from Board of Selectmen Clarifies Recent Issues

by Dave Atkins

Here is a copy of a 3-page letter sent today to Westwood residents describing the recent issues around changes to zoning and the Westwood Station project. To download the document, click the link below to "1 attachment."

Rental Update

by Dave Atkins

There is a good article in the Hometown Weekly about the Westwood Station condo/rental issue with some more specifics and rationale behind what is being proposed. Two non-sequiters for me:

  • Michael Jaillet, Westwood Town Administrator, says the quality of the units will not change. OK, but let's be honest, even it makes us look like snobs. This issue is not the quality of the housing, it is about the quality of the residents. I am not saying renters are "bad" people, but they have different motivations, different priorities that will change the character of the development regardless of the physical quality of the housing.
  • The article talks about this real estate as if each unit will be sold/leased in a unit by unit, optional manner, although the quality of the units will not change. How does that work? I don't believe potential home buyers look at a home, decide they can't afford to buy it, but would like to rent instead. Rent-to-own condos?

Rental Units at Westwood Station

by Dave Atkins

I was surprised to see the news story this week that the "luxury condos" planned for Westwood Station had quickly become apartments. And then there is the proposal to allow a grocery store to sell beer and wine. These are the kinds of things that happen in this town with no publicity (until after the fact) and no effort to involve the affected residents. Perhaps this stuff is discussed at the many, many meetings that have been going on, but if so, why isn't it publicly discussed until decisions have been made? After the decisions have been made, the only discussion we can have is negative complaining which tends to get tuned out by those it doesn't affect directly. I would love to hear if the Selectmen candidates have any ideas on how we could create some way for ongoing involvement by the community in the growth of Westwood Station.

With respect to the rentals, I have some basic questions? Why in the world would the developer want to go into apartment management? If there is a rental market, then some of the purchasers of the condos will rent them. But how can you ever expect apartments to become owner-occupied units? Why not just remove (if there was one) the zoning restriction on renting and let the market sort out what percentage of the condos are owner-occupied?

I think a prosperous, successful Westwood Station might inspire people to want to move here and condos would give some of them (younger professional people just starting out) an entry into the residential real estate market that they could not otherwise afford--an alternative to a starter home out on 495. But making it 100% rental from the start means the people will likely live here and move on. If I were a young professional person...why would I want to rent an apartment in Westwood when I could do as well in Somerville without being stuck out in the burbs? How will these rentals compete with the Jefferson Place rental across from the Dedham Corporate Center rail stop?

I'm supportive of Westwood Station, but I think the residential component is something that is often overlooked, but actually critical to the success of the project. Economic development these days is all about creating a place where people want to live, not just attracting companies or building stores. More affordable owner occupied units would seem to me more marketable than apartments, but I don't know what if any market analysis has been done. Clearly, the real estate market is a problem right now, but it would be great to get more insight and more community involvement in this process.

As a side note, I would like to encourage commenters to use real names when they respond to articles on this site. Authors like "Westwood Resident" and "Concerned Resident" make good points, but I think it is much more effective for people to use their real names--at least a first name and last initial. The early internet was all about anonymity, but these days I think people are looking for greater transparency and authenticity.

Syndicate content