Skip to Content

town meeting

WestCAT to Broadcast Town Meeting

by Dave Atkins

Westwood Community Access Television plans to record and livestream tonight's Annual Town Meeting over the internet. We cannot broadcast on the cable channel yet because we have not completed the transfer of local origination programming from Comcast, but hopefully, we will be able to provide a live feed as we did at the Special Town Meeting. Check back here around 7:30pm if you cannot attend the meeting in person.

Another Town Meeting to Decide Fate of Westwood Station

by Dave Atkins

It is probably an overstatement to say that tonight's vote will ultimately decide the fate of Westwood Station. Over the past several years, the project has been punctuated by a series of do-or-die moments, followed by periods of dormancy. All the while, there has been almost non-existent communication from the project to the residents except at these critical votes--although I must credit Chris McKeown, the project manager, with his willingness to discuss the project with me and others who have questions. I am convinced there is no active effort to hide anything and in fact, the people working on this are working tirelessly to deal with the complicated minutiae of the details and the constantly shifting economic and political climate. The volume of material released in the past few months is a sincere effort to provide residents with as much information as possible.

It is a great deal of information though. Perhaps too much information. Hours of presentations don't add up to more transparency, just more meetings to sit through waiting to speak. I'm sure tonight, we will have to sit for at least an hour to be educated on I-Cubed while many people are just sitting there waiting for a chance to ask questions like:

If the state is willing to contribute $49 million to get this project moving, how can it possibly stall based on a lack of an extra $6 million?

As far as I can tell the purpose of I-Cubed involvement here is more political than practical. It gives the Town some "skin in the game" so to speak. It provides an opportunity to launch an innovative program (I-Cubed has not be utilized anywhere else yet) with a high degree of leverage so that when the overall project is successful, the Governor can point to this initiative as having made the difference. It would make a great case-study in public-private partnership--and maybe it should--but that is not our concern.

Our concern is first of all whether we should use this vote to try and kill a project we don't like. Are we willing to walk away from this and hope we can find other sources of tax revenue in the future to prevent or lessen overrides? The vote is pretty easy if you make that choice first. After that, it's just a bunch of predictions, legalese, assumptions, and speculation to rationalize a choice already made.

I am not a person who just defers to authority...but it seems this kind of proposal is precisely what the Finance Commission was created to evaluate. There are 15 people on that Commission who reviewed this and have been involved in the process all along to varying degrees. The material that has been published sits out there for people with more time on their hands and a bigger axe to grind than I...and no one has presented a strong technical or financial argument against I-Cubed of which I am aware. Last year we argued about liquor licenses and fairness to Roche Bros.; this year, it seems there are many questions and suspicion/skepticism but not a strong argument against the program itself.

So to me, it comes back to Westwood Station itself. If you think what's currently proposed is going to be a net negative to quality of life in town, vote no. Otherwise, vote yes and let's get on with this thing.

I-Cubed Fact Check

by Dave Atkins

Based on the back-and-forth here I obtained some clarifying information related to the potential financing of the infrastructure improvements around Westwood Station. I don't have any substantive updates on building, traffic calming, etc., but here's what's going on with I-Cubed. My information below is the best I was able to learn, but please understand things change constantly and this is not an "official" report from the Town. I'll update this with comments if I've gotten anything wrong here...

A Boring Town Meeting?

by Dave Atkins
Painting: Liberty Leading the People
Civic
Agenda

On Monday, the Finance Commission will hold a public hearing on the upcoming Annual Town Meeting warrant articles. If you've taken a look at the bright red flyer that was mailed to all residents, you will notice six articles have been withdrawn including the petition articles to rezone/vary the Lambert's property for selling beer and wine.

So what's left? Well, of course there is the budget and essentially that's the point of town meeting this year. Approve the budget so the Town can keep operating... Then, there are some planning board articles that apparently provided a bit of a mathematics comprehension challenge at the last hearing.

And there is the placeholder article for Westwood Station. I still have heard no new information on whether any progress is being made or if the I-Cubed funding is even still on the table. Since the Board of Selectmen are meeting in the Faculty room at the High School just prior to the FinCom hearing in the Little Theatre, it is possible the placeholder article could take on new life--just in time to be voted on by FinCom. Monday's hearing is the final public hearing related to Annual Town Meeting.

Broadcasting Live from Town Meeting

by JohnCraine
Westwood Community Access Television

Westwood Community Access Television (WestCAT), the town's non-profit public access television corporation, long in the planning stages had its first opportunity last night to provide live gavel-to-gavel coverage of a town meeting. An overflow crowd in the high school auditorium for a Special Town Meeting, viewed a presentation on the need for a new library, participated in heated discussion and overwhelmingly voted to approve the $13-million in construction costs. WestCAT recently hired an Executive Director and purchased equipment to launch a public access channel that will covering town meetings, events and provide an opportunity for local residents to showcase programming endeavors. WestCAT's state-of-the-art equipment was employed in the coverage. ED Greg Moberg manned the camera which provided a live feed set up by WestCAT board member, Dave Atkins, that could be seen 'live streaming' on WestCAT's website. With the high school auditorium filled to capacity, WestCAT's live internet feed was piped to the small auditorium for the benefit of the overflow crowd. Those who watched seemed very impressed with WestCAT's first effort at town coverage.

"We're extremely excited that we were able to provide coverage of our first Town Meeting and doubly so because our live streaming experiment actually solved a potential problem for meeting organizers", said WestCAT's President, John Craine.

Still in the formative stages, WestCAT's short range goal is to provide coverage of Selectmen, School Committee and other town meetings. The group is also working with Comcast and Verizon to get the programming on the local cable channels. In the meantime, video from town events will soon be available on WestCAT's website www.westwoodtv.org.

WestCAT is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit corporation.

I-Cubed Again

by Dave Atkins

Expect a fast track and mad scramble on all fronts as life is breathed back into the Westwood Station project following Governor Patrick's announcement that the state is ready to spend up to $55 million to thaw the snow from the frozen mounds of dirt on University Ave.

Part of the funding now depends on Cabot, Cabot, and Forbes pursuing I-Cubed financing--which will require authorization from Town Meeting. The meeting warrant was closed on January 4, but the Board of Selectmen placed several "placeholder" articles in the warrant to allow for possible future Westwood Station-related issues. These will likely be updated to include whatever is necessary.

Last night's Finance Commission meeting began to consider annual town meeting warrant articles, but tonight, in addition to a Library presentation, the Commission will hear an update on Westwood Station. Future meetings will provide an opportunity to more fully discuss whatever measures come foward. At this point, CC&F must still re-apply for the funding, so discussion remains speculative at best...

Library Update

by Dave Atkins

Residents will likely be asked to approve a debt exclusion override at the Special Town Meeting to be held on March 8, 2010, for the purposes of funding the construction of a new/replacement Main Library. The latest news and updates can be found on the Library web site and project blog.

The Westwood-Walpole League of Woman Voters will host a town-wide presentation on the new library project at the First Parish Meeting Hall on Sunday, February 7, 2010 at 2:00pm.

Public input and discussion begins this week and continues through February...

A Busy Winter for Westwood

by Dave Atkins

There are no shortage of potential topics to discuss in this town. Ideally, each one would start as its own post, but I just wanted to list out some of the things I'm wondering about that are not being covered by the press extensively and/or are not in a finalized state where the town would have published anything.

Last night, the Economic Development Advisory Board met after being completely re-organized. Regardless of what is going on or not going on with Westwood Station, what is the purpose of that? What is the town doing to promote business development--both small and large? A few years ago, an economic development director was hired; then she left and went to Needham. Is there any kind of association of Westwood small business owners I could join? Or start?

The Pedestran and Bicycle Safety Committee is meeting tonight. I posted it officially at town hall as required by law and on the town website, but haven't even posted it here on my blog. We have a lot going on and I'm happy to respond to questions.

The Dunkin Donuts on Route 1 was robbed at gunpoint last Tuesday. Yes, there was a story in the Westwood Press but it would be good to learn more.

FinComm met on Tuesday night. Was that about the Library...or the budget in general...or prep for discussing the warrants for the town meetings coming up? There is a lot of specualtion but I would suspect the majority of residents are not paying attention yet--until the override campaigns start. There is a blog about the Library project and plenty of information and meetings going on, but it would be great to hear what people are thinking and start the discussion earlier before it turns into a campaign.

The challenge of municipal finance in general is a complex topic that could stand some reasonable discussion that is not framed in crisis. It sounds like the dire circumstances predicted at the last Board of Selectmen meeting I attended are less dire now, but I don't know.

The meeting warrants are open for two Town meetings. Last year I was criticized for observing that the warrant had closed in January and so no one could get anything on the agenda for the May meeting.  So if you have anything for next year...you have a few weeks now to either convince the Selectmen to include it or gather petition signatures. I'm not looking to re-open a debate on the process of Town Meeting, but now is the time to prepare so if you have something, it can be proposed, discussed, etc.

There is an active Government and Charter Study Task force meeting twice a month to consider improvements to town governance. So, for those who felt their efforts last year went down in flames...it's worth a look to see the work that is actually being done now.

In December, the Town will hold an "ascertainment hearing" to hear from residents what their needs are vis-a-vs the Comcast and Verizon television contracts. The hearing will concern, among other things, the amount of operational budget available for community access tv programming. The nonprofit WestCAT was formed almost two years ago (I'm on the board) and we have now hired a person to build out a station here in Westwood...

2009 Town Meeting plus Video

by Dave Atkins

First of all, I intend to provide live video updates to tonight's town meeting. I am not promising 100% coverage, but I will be able to post short video clips from my phone during the meeting, so residents can check back here on the blog to see whether they should leap into their cars and drive down to the High School...

As Abby noted in the Hometown Weekly last week, tonight's town meeting is devoid of what had become a famiiar refrain of Westwood-station related crisis legislation. Instead, we have have a number of funding issues and the uncertain fate of some attempts to modify the town charter through petition articles.

  • Article 10 concerns authorizing money to construct a cemetery barn--using funds restricted to cemetery uses.
  • Article 11 authorizes $60,000 to be spent on design and planning of a new Library. 
  • Articles 17, 18, and 19 are the Petition articles discussed and opposed by FinCom.

Cemetery and Library

The principal concern of opponents to these issues seems to be timing. An alternative view is that difficult economic times are the best time to make investments in the future.

Petition Articles

The Petition articles are imperfect but they will not even be discussed unless the FinComm recommendation against them is rejected.

I believe the proposal to expand the Board of Selectmen has much merit and should be discussed. It could be pushed off to a Charter commission, but why is it so difficult to discuss the pros and cons of increasing the size of the Board at a public forum where, hopefully, hundreds of residents will turn out? As a petition article related to fundamental rights of civic participation, the opinion of FinCom is certainly relevent because members of FinCom have more insight into active participation in Town affairs than most residents. But Town meeting is most residents' only opportunity for participation, and the only forum where those who are not already connected but have the wherewithall to show up in person on a weeknight for 3 hours can have a say.

One argument against discussing the articles is that they fail to follow proper procedure. This could be remedied by a motion to amend and insert the words "That the town should petition the legislature to grant a change in the Town Charter to effect the following:" before each article.

The other objections go to the substance of the articles and should be discussed so that if the articles have some merit but need reforming, there can be a public discussion now. Ultimately, it is up to the Moderator to rule on whether amendments are germane...but we will not hear any arguments unless the motion is allowed to be considered at all.

The Override Next Year

Finally, in case you did not notice how this topic has evolved, I quote from the Annual Report:

...the Finance Commission anticipates that the budgeting process next year will be extremely difficult and virtually impossible to sustain services in another year without growth in revenues. As a result, it is quite likely that an operational override will be considered and eventually proposed to voters.

So next year's Town Election will probably draw more than 15% turnout...

Democratic Process and Petition Articles

by Dave Atkins

The three petition articles relating to term limits, increasing the size of the Board of Selectmen, and Saturday voting for Town Election were voted down by the Finance Commission. The Finance Commission voted to recommend indefinite postponement. Prior to Town Meeting, there will be a report issued with the reason for the opinion of the Finance Commission, but I wanted to clarify and discuss the procedure here as there has been some confusion about the "power" of the Finance Commission to "control" Town Meeting.

According to the Town Bylaws:

SECTION 9. Motions under the Article; Negative and Affirmative Motions. a) The recommendation of the finance commission shall be the first motion under an article of the warrant and shall be considered the main motion. b) A motion for indefinite postponement shall be equivalent to a motion that no action be taken under the article and such motion may not be amended. c) If the vote of the town shall defeat the motion of indefinite postponement, favorable action on the subject matter of the article shall require a motion to that effect. d) Any motion shall be reduced to writing if the moderator so requests.

and

SECTION 6. Majority Vote. Unless otherwise provided by law or bylaw, all motions shall require a majority vote of the voters present and voting. A motion may be withdrawn by the mover if no objection is made.

This means for those who wish the opportunity for the town to vote up or down, all that is required is a majority vote to first reject the recommendation of the Finance Commission.

Perhaps it seems a distinction without a difference, but I will vote to reject indefinite postponement because these articles are issues of fundamental democracy and civic participation. They deserve an up or down vote. If they are bad ideas, let them go down in flames and we will learn the true will of the people.

Even more importantly, the impression, right or wrong, that reform ideas were killed by an unelected body of town insiders with a vested interest in preserving the status quo just adds fuel to the fire of those who see conspiracy and cronyism at work. I'm not saying FinComm should have acted differently. But I think these articles are worth an up or down vote and hope Town Meeting will agree to at least debate them.

Syndicate content